Story. Lens and looking glass.


I barely watch broadcast television any more - and all too often even the news is a victory of prominence over significance. I don't know about you but making an appointment with a TV in order to be informed, educated and entertained seems like a ludicrous thing to do in this age. Netflix and other online, on-demand providers enjoy an unlimited shelf space that makes enduring works available at a time convenient to me. Why do I want to enjoy these works? For the story of course. The dual purpose of entertainment has always been to both escape and explore reality.

There is a second problem, and it also applies to the film industry. Over sensitive to ratings, insipid commissioning is prone to choosing remakes over reinvention. There is a chasm of difference between the process by which great works are made and simply re-making great works. The latter is often doomed to obscurity because we just misunderstand story. We think of it as a manifestation of some creative aethereal flux, mystical even. Why does Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice endure so well? Could it be that it makes an argument for solving a problem that every generation faces - how to marry well? In his film Sicko, Michael Moore argues for a better healthcare system for America. Both are stories. Argument is not a word we often associate with story.

It is one of our oldest cultural artefacts, we humans are wired for story. Yet it is one for which familiarity has not brought great comprehension. Some of us appear to be born with a innate storytelling ability. For many of us it is an enjoyable mystery. Understanding its nature should encompass both factual and fictional stories within a single and comprehensive definition.

For a long time Astrology was a model of reality, a lens used to explore various facets of the Universe and their causal impact on life. Today, if we wish to make cosmological predictions then we generally turn to the science of Astronomy. Newton's insights into gravitation produced a theoretical description we could use to make useful predictions about things like how to fly machines around our solar system.

How might we usefully define story? Stories contain messages. Messages are nuggets designed to impact a mind. A story is a collection of messages encoded in a robust structure that retains its integrity through time, language and retelling. If a story is to stand alone and last then the intention must be to impact minds without recourse to the author.

We might define a complete story as a mind's argument for the solution to a problem. The power of complete story is thus immediately clear; it allows audiences to explore a problem and its solution in a way that is as natural as it is compelling. We continue to need stories just as we always have. They allow us to rehearse our own response to the inequities of existence and make them as our own.


There is a rabbit hole. I suggest jumping in here, here and the comic book here.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Framing Questions for Interviews

Come on Steenbeck

IPTV World Forum 2008

Naked Bike Ride Southampton - A film

The New Producers Part 1 - Who is making paying content for free?

News, fast and furious...

Trimming the taproot, St Malo Corsairs and the Falklands Islands

Reality of iPhone Reporting

The New Producers Part 2 - How do you monetise free content?

It's not Groundhog Day, it's oscillating between the horns of a dilemma