News, fast and furious...
Smartphones are increasingly being used to capture audio and video. Whilst it's true they are getting very much better, they have limitations which prevent them from achieving the best of their capabilities:
- they are so light it's hard to hold them still
- they have very small lenses which limit the amount of light reaching the sensor
- their built-in microphones often face a different direction from the camera and cannot get close enough for good interview sound.
But smartphones are also computers, and very powerful ones. They can run programmes which are able to interact with sound, stills and video. Editing apps are becoming very common and they can take the footage and turn it into the same sort of packages produced by the long established equipment and processes available to broadcast television. What's more, they can also upload these packages directly to a newsroom server.
This ability to edit and upload what has been shot gives them a singular advantage in the news acquisition process. It's possible to reduce the time taken from shoot to distribution - massively in some cases.
If these devices were to continue to be limited by the quality of sound and image then the results would remain consigned to occasional and emergency use. However, there have been some innovative developments.

So now we have a more stable platform which can record images better than we had in the late 1970s, and close to broadcast sound. Reasonable footage can now be recorded but also edited and uploaded.
The most compelling reason for using these devices is the speed at which stories can be turned around. The process is disruptively fast. The footage is stored in the camera which means it's instantly available to the editing software. A package can be turned around, and online, within thirty minutes.
The iPhone shooting kit is small and light. You don't need a carnet to move it around the world and it's comparatively cheap so you can dump it and run if things get hot. When you consider the costs of maintaining a traditional crew and the time taken to turn round a 90sec package then this has to be a winner. A journalist can turn around half a dozen packages and have them ready for distribution in the tome it takes to make one by traditional means. As budgets get lighter so this is going to become a significant way of working.
Comments