Reverse Angle

Smartphones are increasingly being used to capture audio and video. Whilst it's true they are getting very much better, they have limitations which prevent them from achieving the best of their capabilities: they are so light it's hard to hold them still they have very small lenses which limit the amount of light reaching the sensor their built-in microphones often face a different direction from the camera and cannot get close enough for good interview sound. Much of the footage that they generate is used simply because it can be made and it's broadcast only when there is no alternative. We have become used to the footage from Egypt, Libya, Syria and the London riots. But smartphones are also computers, and very powerful ones. They can run programmes which are able to interact with sound, stills and video. Editing apps are becoming very common and they can take the footage and turn it into the same sort of packages produced by the long established equipment and pr

There are three main areas of concern over using iPhone as a tool for mobile journalism: • Video quality. Here is a side by side test of the 4S and the Canon 5D Mk II - http://vimeo.com/30606785  shows them hard to tell apart. But there are reasonable criticisms; shaky images and a tiny lens. To address these issues there is a device which holds an large accessory lens, weighs more and has many extra points of attachment for accessories and mono/tripods. The Owle Bubo now sells under another name but is still available. • Sound. There is an extremely expensive app, Lucie Live is Skype on steroids, which is currently used by broadcasters like the BBC. It can use the iPhone internal mic, which produces broadcastable sound. But, with an impedance matching cable from VeriCorder you can use unpowered or self powered XLR broadcast quality mics. The iPhone handles sound at above broadcast specs. If you need Phantom power then there are pre-amps you can get. I regularly use reporter, radio

News has many paths to get from event to edit. From a phone to a satellite link covers a lot of different technology and technique. It also depends on what is being covered, how it is being covered, and for how long. The traditional broadcast ENG workflow is expensive. A lot of online and print newsrooms try to emulate the broadcasters, but with cheaper equipment to control costs. Sony A1 and PD150 instead of 570 DV Cam and XDCAM HD cameras etc. The model involves some research, a shoot then back to base for an edit - or on laptop if freelance. And it's fine, but slow. The reason for working like that is the traditional limitations of tape based workflow and the fact that the edit equipment is separate from the camera. But technology has mitigated these limitations. If you have a camera, audio, computer and data connectivity on the same device then you can shoot, edit and deliver complete packages very quickly. Here is our coverage of WAN-IFRA's Digital Media Europe 2012

The fourteenth century is not one which the English celebrate with any great pride - if, indeed, at all. The population had been halved by the Black Death, two kings wrested from their throne, and English dreams of empire had crumbled in the attrition of the hundred years war. Not quite the end of the world, but you could definitely see it from there. In the candlelit Kentish dark, and with his quill on vellum, the then Clerk of Romney wrote up his Register. Daniel Rough added a short epigram which may well have been his critique on the times in which he lived: Si sapiens fore vis sex servus qui tibi mando Quid dicas et ubi, de quo, cur, quomodo, quando. If you wish to be wise I commend to you six servants Ask what, where, about what, why, how, when. Some six hundred years later, the relationship with France was healing, the British Empire far exceeded expectations, and a journalist called Rudyard Kipling had a story published in a womens' magazine. The Elephant's Chi

There is a central dichotomy for news media organisations. Doing the news properly is very expensive. To do the news properly means being completely independent. Funding the news generally depends upon advertising revenue. Advertising requires a relationship with the advertiser. This is a conflict because how can you have an independent activity when it is dependent, for its function, on precisely those from whom it should be independent in the first place? If you see what I mean. Al Jazeera is probably the most respected news service in the world - it will remain so long as it gets its funding from a hands-off benefactor. Second in reputation to AJ is the BBC's news service. It is funded by public license fee and is quickly in trouble with which ever government is in power at any given time. It's mandated to speak truth to power. It seems these things go in cycles. In 1896, Adolph Ochs bought and saved the New York Times by focusing on excellent and principled journalism.